SPECULATIVE DESIGN

FUTURE OF

Future of Support

SUPPORT

Exploring how people build trust when support is shared between humans and AI.

SCROLL DOWN ↓

Notice · Proprietary Protections

This case operates under NDA.

Developed in partnership with Google Cloud as part of a Cornell MPS project. Due to confidentiality requirements, proprietary frameworks, research artifacts, and detailed designs have been omitted.

This case study focuses on the problem space, design process, and key learnings.

QUESTIONS? →

02.  THE CHALLENGE

Designing trust in human–AI collaboration

Customer support is increasingly delivered by a combination of humans and AI, raising new questions about responsibility, transparency, and user control.

How might we design support experiences that remain trustworthy when AI shares the work?

Customer support context

03.  MY ROLE

PROJECT TEAM LEAD.

I led a multidisciplinary team through research, synthesis, and concept development. My primary contributions included planning the project, coordinating stakeholder communication with Google Cloud, conducting qualitative research, and translating findings into design principles that guided the final concepts.

SERVICE DESIGN HUMAN-AI SYSTEMS DESIGN RESEARCH SYSTEMS THINKING RESPONSIBLE AI

TEAM: ZUHA KALEEM · NAYOUNG KIM · XUYUAN LIU · ZUNYANG CHEN · VIVIAN FENG · MARIA CHANG

TEAM

04.  THE CRITICAL QUESTIONS

WE SHIFTED FROM BASELINE USABILITY TO THREE FOUNDATIONAL PILLARS.

01

Power Dynamics

Understanding how decisions, incentives, and control are distributed across human-AI systems.

"Who controls the data loop when AI and humans collaborate?"

02

Accountability Frameworks

Examining what happens when systems fail and responsibility becomes difficult to trace.

"What happens to user trust during complex failure states?"

03

Vulnerability Mitigation

Designing for people navigating stress, grief, urgency, or uncertainty.

"How do we protect and support users when the stakes are high?"

05.  THE METHOD

SPECULATIVE DESIGN AS A RESEARCH TOOL

Traditional UX methods evaluate existing experiences. Our challenge was different: understanding how people might respond to support systems that do not yet exist.

Rather than predicting the future, we used speculative design to create provocative support scenarios and discuss them with participants. These scenarios helped reveal expectations around trust, accountability, fairness, and the role of AI in customer support.

TEAM

06.  KEY FINDINGS

WHAT THE RESEARCH REVEALED

Across workshops, interviews, and speculative probe sessions, three recurring patterns emerged with consistent force. These findings shaped the design principles and strategic recommendations delivered to Google Cloud.

FINDING 1 / TRANSPARENCY

Defining the Lines of Responsibility

Trust depends on clear attribution of action. When users cannot distinguish between human and AI agents, they struggle to understand who is responsible for decisions and outcomes.

"I need to know who I'm talking to. Not because I distrust AI — but because the stakes of this conversation require a person to be responsible for the outcome."

WORKSHOP PARTICIPANT

FINDING 2 / AGENCY

The Failure Point of Frictionless Automation

Speed alone is not sufficient in complex support contexts. When users cannot easily escalate to a human, autonomous systems can feel opaque and disempowering, which reduces trust even when the issue is technically resolved.

"The system resolved my issue in under two minutes. But I felt worse afterward. I never understood what happened or who decided it."

WORKSHOP PARTICIPANT

FINDING 3 / TONE

Grounded Communication in High-Stakes Scenarios

In high-stakes support contexts, users prioritize clear, functional communication and easy access to human help. Attempts by AI to simulate empathy are often rejected when they obscure resolution paths.

"Don't tell me you 'understand how frustrating this must be.' Just tell me what's happening and get me to someone who can actually help."

WORKSHOP PARTICIPANT

01 / 03

07.  THE SHIFT

FROM INTERFACE CLARITY TO SYSTEMIC POWER.

Working on this project shifted my focus from interface design to system design. It highlighted how decisions around data, automation, and failure states shape user outcomes, and reinforced the importance of building systems that preserve transparency and agency.

← BACK TO ALL WORK GET IN TOUCH →